Replies

I don't get why she can "testify" on Sixty Minutes but not before the Commission on TV. She needs to get up there and refute this garbage. If it is, in fact, garbage.

21 posted on 03/28/2004 5:06:04 PM PST by Terry Mross

I am tired of the Bush traps that turn out not to be so. CFR, immigration - all these Bismarkian like "traps" that never pan out.

22 posted on 03/28/2004 5:32:47 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)

I don't get why she can "testify" on Sixty Minutes but not before the Commission on TV. She needs to get up there and refute this garbage. If it is, in fact, garbage

Do you understand the terms "Partisan Witch hunt"? Do you understand why you do NOT establish the precedence that anytime a hyper partisan minoirity Congress party wants it can demand the NSA Advisor (A president employee not currently subject to Congressional Oversite) be subject to a Public show trial to feed their hysteric partisan bigotry? Why should Condi go before a Comission that is currently whitewashing the Clinton's role in 9-11? It is fairly obvious that no real solutions are being sought by the Comission only scapegoats. I say treat the Comission with the contempt it's actions demonstrate it deserves

31 posted on 03/29/2004 8:54:50 AM PST by MNJohnnie (If you have to pretend to be something you are not, you have all ready lost the debate)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794