Replies

"I plan to go to the debate Monday night and I may have more specific info after that."

Thanks for the Isakson info. I just got home from that Cobb debate he was supposed to attend. What did you think of it? So much for getting any more information about him!! I was disappointed that Mr. Isakson didn't attend, and after hearing Cain speak, I can see why he wouldn't want to. I had never heard Cain before the debate, and I was amazed by the solidly conservative content of his speeches, not to mention his eloquence. I think Cain had a more better message than both Bartell and Collins, and he was certainly the superior debater (although Bartel had his moments). I found Mac Collins to be rather rude and good-old-boyish (if that's a word). You know what I mean. Did it bother you when Mac Collins kept saying--in that thick Southern accent of his--"I am a policy wawnk."? Ugh! If you have to tell people that you're an intellectual, you're probably not one...

Anyways, I would have loved to see Herman tear Isakson apart in that questions section. After tonight's debate, I have so much more confidence in Herman Cain as a candidate--"he's not a politician, he's a problem solver," :) It was also great to see that he had so much enthusiastic support. Next time around, I know for a fact that Herman Cain can and will obliterate Johnny Isakson in a debate...as long as Johnny doesn't weasel out of it!

"I just got home from that Cobb debate he was supposed to attend. What did you think of it?"

I thought that Herman was impressive, but I was not surprised at that. Mac was actually weaker than I had thought he would be, and Al Bartell was better than I anticipated. I voted for Bartell for Lt. Gov 2 years ago, but he's no Herman Cain. Early in the debate, Mac went over his allotted time every single question. I thought that hurt him ... especially since he wasn't saying anything noteworthy to begin with.

Skipping debates is not unusual for a frontrunner, but I think this tactic may hurt Johnny if Herman continues to build momentum, especially with Johnny's reputation as a flip-flopper. Herman has Johnny in his sights and he just may catch him.

Herman's supporters were certainly more visible and enthusiastic last night; it will be interesting to see if that remains the case in a debate in which Johnny shows up. BTW, there is another debate on May 1 in Gwinnett and I believe Johnny will grace that event with his presence.

"I was disappointed that Mr. Isakson didn't attend, and after hearing Cain speak, I can see why he wouldn't want to. I had never heard Cain before the debate, and I was amazed by the solidly conservative content of his speeches, not to mention his eloquence. I think Cain had a more better message than both Bartell and Collins, and he was certainly the superior debater (although Bartel had his moments)."

I thought Herman was relaxed, confident, articulate and dynamic. You can tell that he is a motivational speaker. Johnny always reminds me (if you will forgive my bluntness) of someone in dire need of a 45 minute nap. Mr. Charisma he is not. I haven't seen them on the same stage together yet, but I am guessing that the contrast will be vivid.

Herman, BTW, is just as good in person - one on one. Very positive and upbeat, but a great listener, too. No wonder he is gathering such momentum.

I hear that south Georgia is taking to him in a big way, also. I can smell an upset brewing.

While on the phone with a friend the other night, we were talking about the lack of Johnny at the upcoming Cobb debate. My friend said he would make a "Where's Johnny?" sign - it got Herman's attention, it got the media's attention and it has gotten a lot of people talking. I am trying to get him to go to the next debate that Johnny isn't there with the sign and wear a chicken suit!