Skip to comments.
Richard Clarke and the Psychology of Betrayal
Dexter Ala's Commentary ^
| 3/28.2004
| Dexter Ala
Posted on 03/27/2004 2:35:47 PM PST by dala
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
03/27/2004 2:35:47 PM PST
by
dala
To: dala
Next there is the narcissist, the vanity traitor, the guy who doesn?t feel he?s receiving the recognition he deserves.
This would be Clarke.
2
posted on
03/27/2004 2:39:32 PM PST
by
Asclepius
To: Asclepius
btt
3
posted on
03/27/2004 2:41:06 PM PST
by
nopardons
To: Asclepius
"Further, we see greed as the motive for betrayal, the traitor who just wants the enemy to show him the money" Or as I posted earlier, perhaps Soros money is in play here.
4
posted on
03/27/2004 2:53:26 PM PST
by
trek
To: trek
This guy Clark, is a real piece of work.
To: dala
Interesting piece. There is something about him that is very troubling. I posted the following on another thread this morning:
________________
Ya know, like others, I take pride in my ability to read someone's demeanor, body language, and even their personal ticks. When I was much younger I did not trust my intuition when it came to the messages we get from observing another's behavior in various settings. It's probably one of the most frustrating things about posting on FR and elsewhere - we don't get to take in the whole person from post to post.
After watching and listening to Clarke during the hearings he strikes me as a very insecure, petty twit. As a government bureaucrat he was fortunate enough to find his niche which allowed him to rub shoulders with real experts. His government service allowed him to rise to the Pin Stripe Suit level of the government without ever being appointed to an Ambassadorship or being elected to anything. He secretly despises those who have. His resentment has grown to a point where he has started to believe his own BS and, in turn, allowed him to be used by those who would try to unseat a sitting president.
6
posted on
03/27/2004 2:56:02 PM PST
by
leadpenny
To: leadpenny
I hope Clarke goes down hard but, the media just will not let it happen.
To: dala
There has been talk for decades of a possible mole high in the American intelligence community. This type of profile could be useful in identifying the person. I am NOT saying it was Clarke.
8
posted on
03/27/2004 3:07:16 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is slavery.)
To: dala
Seems to me that the timing of Clarke's book and his actions would lead me to consider "greed" as one of the top picks for his turnabout actions.
To: MaggiesDad
hope Clarke goes down hard but, the media just will not let it happen. Media outlets are demanding that any criticism of republicans remain front page, even when discredited. The media is the problem.
Does anyone know who owns Reuters? They are being played like a drum with every minor charge or suggestion that comes along.
10
posted on
03/27/2004 3:20:34 PM PST
by
alrea
To: leadpenny
Think you may be on to something.....Don't forget to add that when Bush took over Clarke had to report to Dr. Rice... a woman of African American origin.....
The fact that he didn't bother to show up for her staff meetings until she emailed him twrice to be there; plus his comment that he had to "inform" her about the enemy says a lot about his attitude toward her........latent racial/gender problems? Possibly!
11
posted on
03/27/2004 3:23:47 PM PST
by
hoosiermama
(Wonder if Clarke will make enough on his book to pay for his legal fees for perjury?)
To: leadpenny
I agree with your praise for this article and with your and the author's "assessments" of Clarke.
Maybe Clarke is just flipping for the book sales -- but I wonder if he wasn't given encouragement from someone like Soros to turn his book into the screed it became.
This guy may (and should) face real consequences for his perjury in these various under oath testimonies. Watch who comes to his aid on the legal front. That may be telling.
To: MaggiesDad
I believe Clarke is working with the DNC and Kerry camapign. This is the very same group that had a woman take video tapes of GW Bush's debate practice tapes and send them to the appropriate people that denied knowing anything about it. You think this Joe Wilson and Richard Clarke double teaming is by accident? Like heck it is. It is a well planned Democrat election move. Watch for the next weasel soon. They are out to dismantle the Bush whitehouse with attacks from all sides. Unless Bush Cheney want to toss in the towel, they had better get moving with similiar efforts. There is nothing the Dems will not do to get back into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
To: dala
More distraction from the mandarins at Foggy Bottom....blame the psychology of the man not his puppet masters.
14
posted on
03/27/2004 3:35:47 PM PST
by
ijcr
(Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ability.)
To: ijcr
The masters have deniability
To: alrea
"Reuters"
A little History of Reuters. British National and Provincial Press took over it during WW2. During the war The British government and Reuters didn't have a very good relationship. As to their relationship now, I'm unsure of it.
To: Asclepius
IMHO that would be my guess.
To: hoosiermama
On "Capitol Gang" Robert Novak just brought up the subject of Clarke's deep resentment of Condi Rice. He said that Clarke considered her a "lightweight."
There is going to be more and more things coming out that will show Clarke for the snake that he is. I just hope that when he comes before congress, someone uses the line, "Have you no shame?"
To: dala
The irony is that Clarke has betrayed his country in that he has cast the most effective fighter of terror (George W. Bush and his administration) as a bumbling idiot, giving heart to terrorists everywhere, and perhaps eroding the popularity of Bush to the point where Kerry wins.
I'd call that traitorous behavior, because we know that a Kerry administration will never be as tenacious as a Bush admin in taking the fight directly to the terrorists and the states that sponsor terrorists.
19
posted on
03/27/2004 4:43:24 PM PST
by
Endeavor
(Don't count your Hatch before it chickens)
To: leadpenny
Yep, I just heard Novak say that. I watch Capital Gang every week, although I sometimes wonder why. Only Kate O'Beirne consistantly stands up for what I believe in. There are times I want to shake Bob. And Margaret Carlson is an idiot.
20
posted on
03/27/2004 4:45:53 PM PST
by
Endeavor
(Don't count your Hatch before it chickens)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson