To: Hon; doug from upland; OXENinFLA; Torie; VadeRetro; Hillary's Lovely Legs; Shermy; Travis McGee; ...
2 posted on
03/26/2004 7:53:33 PM PST by
Sabertooth
(< /Kerry>)
To: Sabertooth
Plumbers
3 posted on
03/26/2004 7:55:13 PM PST by
Texasforever
(I am all flamed out.)
To: Sabertooth
They were the files that proved he was a mole for the FBI.
5 posted on
03/26/2004 7:56:06 PM PST by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(How do you ask a flapjack to be the last flapjack to flip flop on an issue for you?)
To: Sabertooth
If these documents were received as the result of a Freedom of Information Act request, they were copies, not the originals. It may cost him an additional fee, but, he should be able to resubmit his FOIA request and obtain them again.
15 posted on
03/26/2004 8:03:16 PM PST by
etcb
To: Sabertooth
Interesting. A coverup in the making?
31 posted on
03/26/2004 8:23:02 PM PST by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT!)
To: Sabertooth
Thanks; interesting. Makes me wonder, why steal copies unless you're also ensured of destroying the originals?--or if you're not ensured of destroying the originals, then what is the motive? Hmmm--something doesn't compute for me here--a piece of the puzzle is missing. My favorite detective is Columbo, and if I was Columbo, this is one of those little loose ends that would have me saying, "Well, that explains it, glad I can tell my boss we can wrap this up--oh, sorry to interrupt you again, but I almost forgot: just one more thing. . ." :)
64 posted on
03/26/2004 10:07:54 PM PST by
Fedora
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
