To: Steven W.
I found an article by Sidney Blumenthal on Salon yesterday (I did link it on another thread). In it he argues that Clarke has "unimpeachable credibility" and says a person can't call Clarke a partisan because he voted for John McCain in the 2000 primary.
So we know he voted McCain. I'll guess in that effort the dems made to vote McCain and oust Bush as the nominee.
Anyway, that is the sum total of proof Clarke and his supporters (when Blumenthal's involved you KNOW we're in the stinky stuff) offer to show he is not a partisan. In other words, their own "proof" makes the opposite case.
68 posted on
03/26/2004 9:19:03 PM PST by
cyncooper
("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
To: cyncooper; Steven W.
110 posted on
03/27/2004 2:11:22 AM PST by
Mo1
(Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
To: cyncooper
And .. if Blumenthal's involved - this is a HILLARY PLAN GONE TERRIBLY WRONG.
221 posted on
03/27/2004 10:45:39 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson