Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mcrommert
Republicans are just as good smearers of Democrats as [Democrats are of] Republicans. It's politics.
You are of course entitled to your opinion. In fact that's all you are entitled to, as far as information is concerned. Since you are entitled to your opinion and to listen to whoever you choose to and to ignore everyone/everything else, I have to be entitled to tell you fairy tales such as the conceit that I am objective. You can't sic the government on me for it; you just have to decide to ignore me if you decide I'm unreliable.

Or you can decide that I am reliable, and choose to pay attention to what I say; your choice.

But when you say, "a pox on both their houses" you are saying that neither side tells the truth - which may not be the best that a liar can hope for if someone is trying to tell you the truth, but it's better than if you believe the truth to the exclusion of the lie. In a sense it's deciding not to have an opinion because sorting out conflicting claims makes your brain hurt.

For myself I take the arbitrator's viewpoint. If I say, "the truth must lie in the middle," all I am doing is destroying all incentive for either party to tell the truth. The bigger the whopper that they tell me, the more they tug "the middle" their way - and the other side just replies in kind if only in self defense. And that is my argument against "moderate" trust in splitting the difference.

I just have to run the risk of straining my brain in order to associate my opinion with the side that is closer to the truth. My analysis of the propaganda war is that journalism is the pilot fish of liberalism, that celebrities typically are in over their heads in a serious analysis of global warming claims and suchlike, and that celebrities - including individual journalists - therefore mouth what they know journalism will not attack.

The perspective of journalism is negative and superficial because journalism is the mass production of cheap talk - second guessing and easy (but unsustainable) answers. The resulting facile perspective is called (in America) "liberalism." And all you do to be a liberal politician is to count on the resulting propaganda wind to propel you to electoral victory. It's all just a matter of never showing courage.

Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate

27 posted on 03/29/2004 4:03:04 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (No one is as subjective as the person who knows he is objective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I agree with you. Using Primary sources in the source for truth does much more good than listening to the media, if they are liberal or conservative.
28 posted on 03/30/2004 9:29:33 AM PST by mcrommert (Whatever Happened to Compassionate Conservatism?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson