[Howlin]

You made it personal when you characterized MY posts -- and used the words "made it up."

[maica]

Hi, Howlin, a little change of topic on this excellent thread, since I have no idea how to start one, I don't even have the category "Breaking News" on my home page.


Dr Rice is on Hannity right now! Maybe she is going to do the Friday at 4:15 "document dump" on her former employee now.

[Mitchell]

You made it personal when you characterized MY posts -- and used the words "made it up."

I apologize for the choice of words, which I see could be taken the wrong way. What I had meant by "made it up" was that you had written the headline yourself, based on your understanding of events. In other words, you made the headline yourself. I did not mean "made it up" in the sense of having intentionally lied; I think I've made it clear that I thought it was a misunderstanding.

Moving away from the personal to something of wider interest, what do you think Stephanopoulos' role in this is? Why do you think he brought out Clarke's affiliation with ABC?

[Darlin']

Thanks for the latest Heads Up about Clarke. Frankly, the date of his employment with ABC is not especially significant to me, the pertinent issue is that he is NOW one of their paid talking heads. You have to ask why ABC is interested in a petty, thin-skinned, former bureaucrat like Clarke. It certainly isn't his appearance or his voice or his charisma (LOL). Nor is it likely they wanted someone on staff with loyalities to the Bush adminstration. It surely isn't due to all the lives his counter-terrorism expertise saved during the 90's. That narrows the list of reasons considerably.