Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Asks Sept. 11 Panel Meet Again With National Security Adviser
AP ^ | 3-25-04 | Jennifer Loven

Posted on 03/25/2004 7:58:20 PM PST by Indy Pendance

WASHINGTON (AP) - The White House on Thursday asked the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to give national security adviser Condoleezza Rice another opportunity to talk privately with panel members.

The White House said, in a letter to the commission chairman and vice chairman from counsel Alberto Gonzales, that such a session would allow her to clear up "a number of mischaracterizations of Dr. Rice's statements and positions."

Rice still would not testify publicly before the panel, as the members and many relatives of victims of the 2001 terrorist attacks want. Gonzales wrote that is important that presidential advisers such as Rice "not be compelled to testify publicly before congressional bodies such as the Commission."

Rice had said Wednesday that she was willing to return for another private session with the commission.

"I also have a responsibility to make sure that the commission knows everything that I know, and that's why I spent four hours with them, and I'm prepared to spend longer with them anywhere they want, any time they want, answer as many questions as they have," she told reporters in a briefing. "And I hope we'll have an opportunity to do that. But I just have to maintain the separation."

But the letter from Gonzales to former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean, a Republican and the commission chairman, and commission vice chairman Lee Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana, represented the White House's formal offer of Rice's return.

Rice met privately with the commission, formally the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, for about four hours on Feb. 7.

In indicating her desire to return, the White House said she wanted to rebut statements made in this week's public testimony before the panel. In particular, Gonzales said Rice wanted the chance to argue that she was not inaccurate when she wrote in a Washington Post opinion piece this week that administration plans before Sept. 11, 2001, called for military options to strike al-Qaida and the Taliban.

Gonzales also sought to set the record straight about the obligation of a presidential aide to testify publicly. He said that statements that other national security advisers have testified before Congress in open sessions were wrong.

Previous testimony from national security advisers have either been in closed session or involved potential criminal wrongdoing, making those situations markedly different from the current one, Gonzales said. In fact, the more common occurrence is for national security advisers to decline to appear publicly, he said.

The panel's review was delayed for months as it battled Bush officials over access to documents and witnesses.

The commission also has been denied the opportunity to question Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney in open session. The White House has agreed to allow those interviews to occur only privately, and only with two commissioners.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; condoleezzarice

1 posted on 03/25/2004 7:58:20 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Rice still would not testify publicly before the panel, as the members and many relatives of victims of the 2001 terrorist attacks want.

"....as the Democrats want, so that they can turn the 9/11 investigation into political theater in order to try to advance their partisan agenda. For the scumbag Democrats, the whole thing has been strictly a political witch-hunt from the beginning. But the most amazing part is that the Democrats have managed to kick over a few rocks and find a few "victim-of-9/11 family members" who are willing to urinate all over the memories of their alleged loved ones in order to help the Democrats advance their selfish political agenda. The shamelessness of these people is beyond words.

2 posted on 03/25/2004 8:07:33 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I hope she goes in and kicks over a few tables!

GIVE 'EM HELL CONDI!

3 posted on 03/25/2004 8:19:51 PM PST by JOE6PAK ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Are the dims seriously trying to pin their 9-11 failures on Rice? They are unbelievable. As is the inept handling by GWB's people.
4 posted on 03/25/2004 8:55:39 PM PST by tkathy (Our economy, our investments, and our jobs DEPEND on powerful national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Rice runs circles around Clarke. She has more intelligence in her pinky than he will ever hope to have as a human. He's a bitter old man who lost his job to a woman.
5 posted on 03/25/2004 9:00:52 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Clinton and Gore have declined to be interviewed in public. Why aren't they mentioned in this article???????
6 posted on 03/25/2004 9:24:11 PM PST by abner (FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com or http://www.wintersoldier.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson