Skip to comments.
In Native Alaska, Nuclear Industry Pitches New 'Micro-Nuke'
Pacific News Service ^
| March 25, 2004
| Eric Mack,
Posted on 03/25/2004 4:33:40 PM PST by Willie Green
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Willie Green
I want one for my car!!!
2
posted on
03/25/2004 4:40:31 PM PST
by
listenhillary
(terrorism n. systematic use of violence to intimidate or coerce societies or governments)
To: Willie Green
To: shaggy eel
Pulsing, pulsing, pulsing!!!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; farmfriend
ping
To: Libertarianize the GOP; *tech_index; RightWhale; Willie Green
Thanks for the ping!
Isn't it just a question of getting the engineering right?
6
posted on
03/26/2004 8:13:50 AM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: hattend; Ditto
Update!
7
posted on
03/26/2004 8:27:53 AM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: Willie Green
Thought the south africans were developing an even safer reactor, a pebble-bed job wherein the uranium in encased in billard ball saized grphite spheres, and uses helium as a heat transfer medium? Anybody here an update on that?
To: Willie Green
...a liquid sodium-cooled reactor...I know next to nothing about nuke technology, but isn't the object to create heat to be used to drive power generating equipment? Would more efficient use of the heat produced lessen the need for cooling?
Seems to me that whatever is being cooled is being wasted.
9
posted on
03/26/2004 8:45:54 AM PST
by
JimRed
(Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
To: Willie Green
"Like anything new, it's going to have to be studied pretty closely before we agree to bring it in," Louden Village Council Chief Peter Captain told the Anchorage Daily News. Translation: we'll study it to death until the window of opportunity passes us by.
It'll create lots of jobs bringing that reactor here and like oil drilling in ANWR we can't have that!
10
posted on
03/26/2004 8:48:59 AM PST
by
hattend
To: JimRed
Well, we do use the heat, alot of it, but those cores get really REALLY hot without constant cooling. Far hotter than what we can safely work with. It's an optimum temperature thing.
11
posted on
03/26/2004 8:50:44 AM PST
by
Shryke
To: JimRed
I know next to nothing about nuke technology, but isn't the object to create heat to be used to drive power generating equipment? Would more efficient use of the heat produced lessen the need for cooling? I'm not a nuclear expert, but heat is a waste product of any system like this, and needs to be dissipated.
12
posted on
03/26/2004 8:53:45 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
To: dirtboy; JimRed
From previous thread:
13
posted on
03/26/2004 9:00:40 AM PST
by
hattend
To: hattend
At 10 cents a kilowatt that is less than I pay in Southern California.
14
posted on
03/26/2004 9:29:55 AM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: JimRed
Seems to me that whatever is being cooled is being wasted.I think you're simply getting a little confused by the technical terminology.
In general, the reactor "coolant" (whether a gas or liquid) is then passed through a heat exhanger to tranfer the energy to whatever is used to generate the electricity.
For example, even in water-cooled reactors, the water that is heated by the reactor is not converted directly to steam to run the generators. It is cirulated through a heat-exchanger to heat a separate water supply. This is what assures that the radioactive contaminated coolant remains safely contained within the reactor while non-radioactive fluid (liquid or gas) is used to run the generators.
To: Willie Green
Thanks for clearing that up!
16
posted on
03/26/2004 10:25:54 AM PST
by
JimRed
(Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
To: JimRed
You're welcome!
17
posted on
03/26/2004 10:51:56 AM PST
by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
To: Willie Green
Hate the thought if the state ever did away with rural elec subsidy. My bill would be 500 rather than 100; what it was in Mat-Su.
One village, they won't sell any land to whites and are anti-everything in the name of environment. Next village, sell their land, soul, and just about anything of value to keep the booze flowing. Find both good and bad people in all villages though..
Few years back, Nick Begich had ideas about gas lines & wells in all the villages. Cheap, clean, and just about everywhere. The oil industry & politicals ended all that talk.
18
posted on
03/31/2004 12:02:02 AM PST
by
Eska
To: Eska
yep...life would be horrible for you if you didn't live off the taxes of others.
19
posted on
03/31/2004 12:04:04 AM PST
by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "I give Dick Clarke's American Grandstand a 39...you can't dance to it.")
To: Fledermaus
yep...life would be horrible for you if you didn't live off the taxes of others.
LOL-LOL-LOL
I hate to laugh at something so damn true,
but the way you put it is uproariously funny.
20
posted on
03/31/2004 12:09:19 AM PST
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson