Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fedupjohn
Dont get your hope up to high, some still have a hard time even calling it a baby.

"Feinstein said that by defining when life begins, the bill was "the first step in removing a woman's right to choice, particularly in the early months of a pregnancy before viability." She said it could also chill embryonic stem cell research. "
17 posted on 03/25/2004 4:37:22 PM PST by boxerblues (4 months and a couple of bandaid wounds do not make a hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: boxerblues
"before viability"

Remember the early days of the abortion debate when viability was the key term? After all, who would EVER be so heartless as to abort a child if it ever had the LEAST chance of surviving on its own! It sure didn't take long to sidestep that little moral qualm, did it?
20 posted on 03/25/2004 4:45:40 PM PST by Socratic (Yes, there is method in the madness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: boxerblues
Feinstein said that by defining when life begins, the bill was "the first step in removing a woman's right to choice, particularly in the early months of a pregnancy before viability."

If there is one thing I cannot stand, its the viability argument. Christopher Reeve can't viably live unassisted ex-utero but I doubt I have the right to terminate him.

But, then, he's not my kid.

21 posted on 03/25/2004 4:46:21 PM PST by grellis (Che cosa ha mangiato?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson