Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
Talk about shootin yer load in a hurry! Again, the amount of hydrogen needed to propel an airfoil of close to zero lift with any sort of payload would be prohibitive to commercial flight.

It'll still be kick the tires and light the fires, on Jet-A or kerosene for another hundred years.

11 posted on 03/25/2004 2:29:31 PM PST by blackdog (I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: blackdog
Actually thre long term plans would be to have a detachable robotic craft thet would really just be a like any other supersonic platform that would get it up to speed and then release it. They would probably have to wait until the technology improved to the point were there were very powerful and very light all composite/cermaic engines, which may be twenty years away but most likely not 100.

Even so it would make a great space entry vehicle.

14 posted on 03/25/2004 2:36:14 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: blackdog
Turbofans to get it off the ground. Existing technology.

Scrams to get it above the atmosphere. Amount of thrust it produces is classified. You don't know how much hydrogen produces how much thrust. No moving parts. Not much more than a specially shaped tube. Simple to produce.

Chemical rockets to achieve escape velocity. Existing technology.
23 posted on 03/25/2004 5:48:33 PM PST by frithguild ("W" is the Black Ice President - underestimated until the left completely loses traction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson