Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYCVirago
According to his testimony today, he only registered as a Republican in 2000, and, as you pointed out, that was to vote for McCain

I wonder if it was to help split the conservative vote in the Primaries?

And why didn't Sid mention who Clarke voted for in the general election??

25 posted on 03/25/2004 1:49:22 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Mo1
I wonder if it was to help split the conservative vote in the Primaries? And why didn't Sid mention who Clarke voted for in the general election??

I think your assumption is correct on the McCain vote. Clarke is claiming that he voted for Bush in the general election, but I'm not buying it. As I posted in another thread on this, he sounds like a freeper troll, emphasizing that he's a Republican, yet claiming with a straight face that Clinton's No. 1 priority was terrorism. Heck, I don't think even Clintonistas would claim that! Clinton's No. 1 priority (besides the obvious) was the economy. And if Clarke really believed that Clinton was so focused on terrorism, then why didn't he vote for Gore, Clinton's successor?

Not to mention Clarke saying that we need to understand why the terrorists hate us -- that's something a peacenik lib would say, not a Republican. It just doesn't pass the smell test. We freepers are very experienced with figuring out when somebody is pretending to be a Republican; unfortunately, the media isn't!

29 posted on 03/25/2004 2:04:02 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson