To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It was a big mistake for her not to testify, but the moment has passed; if she asked to go now, it would look too defensive.
6 posted on
03/24/2004 7:12:53 PM PST by
Howlin
(It's another good day to be a Republican!)
To: Howlin
Unfortunately Bush had to protect the basic fundamentals underlying the separation of the branches in our government and assure the presidency itself is preserved for future presidents, not just this president at this time. Counter this with Bill Clinton's extravagant legal extrapolations to try and create new "Protective Function Privelege" or any of the other myriad of different priveleges he threw at the legal system to try and protect the likes of Bruce Lindsey, Sid Blumenthal or other hit team members during his impeachment. But to see the media & liberals in full spin mode against Bush at this point, you'd never even suspect Clinton was, indeed, impeached & disbarred for perjury and obstructing justice, during the time his (Clinton) administration was supposedly spending every waking moment fighting AlQaeda (or at least when Madeline NotSoBright was clinking glasses of champagne with Kim Jong Il)
To: Howlin
I wondered today if she should go in front of the committee, in an unprecedented move, on Friday during Kerry's "major" economic speech. Kill two rats with one stone, so to speak.
15 posted on
03/24/2004 7:32:47 PM PST by
Jodi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson