To: Sub-Driver
The White House, intensifying its effort to discredit Richard Clarke, took the unusual step... Oh, its a defensive White House, desperately flailing away.
6 posted on
03/24/2004 3:31:56 PM PST by
Plutarch
To: Plutarch
Oh, its a defensive White House, desperately flailing away. Hardly. Clarke is a bald-faced liar, and proved it today.
Don't turn into a jellyfish.
10 posted on
03/24/2004 3:38:18 PM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: Plutarch
Yep. They think we are just stupid. I am sitting here nearly speechless. The reporters haven't read what is right in our hands and are trying to pretend it is just spin. It isn't spin. The things he said is 2002 are factually correct, he doesn't deny them, and they completely destroy their entire case. On WLS in Chicago, normally quite conservative on these things, they are parroting in a slow drone this "ferocious attack" talking point - when they lose utterly, ignore the substance and claim that losing is all the other guy's fault for being meanspirited for showing they are wrong. They think we can't read.
28 posted on
03/24/2004 4:24:57 PM PST by
JasonC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson