To: js1138; Howlin
63 posted on
03/24/2004 3:50:29 PM PST by
hoosiermama
(Ask Kerry to list the major pieces of enacted legislation he has authored in his career.)
To: hoosiermama
74 posted on
03/24/2004 4:02:24 PM PST by
Howlin
(It's another good day to be a Republican!)
To: hoosiermama
And guess what..............CNN and MSNBC are reading from an EMAIL that Clarke send to Condi Rice a few days AFTER 9-11.....and it also contradicts his book!
78 posted on
03/24/2004 4:07:09 PM PST by
Howlin
(It's another good day to be a Republican!)
To: hoosiermama
They spin it, but the essential facts are there. The best interpretation you can give him from the evidence is "disgruntled former employee, demoted by a black woman, seeks revenge."
I understand from other threads that he is under oath from a previous investigation, saying the same things he said in 2002. He is under oath today saying Bush didn't ask him to lie.
I can accept the fact that he puffed Bush up in 2002, but his puffery is filled with specific details that will not spin away.
It os not simply that he defended Bush -- it is the details that prove he is lying now.
85 posted on
03/24/2004 4:15:07 PM PST by
js1138
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
