To: inquest
I was discussing religious freedom and the government's roll. If a kid doesn't want to salute the flag then don't do it. That's different than acknowledging God because the government wants you to pledge and do so. To use government force or coercion to recite a pledge including God seems a violation of the first on religious grounds.
105 posted on
03/24/2004 7:24:07 PM PST by
breakem
To: breakem
I was discussing religious freedom and the government's roll. If a kid doesn't want to salute the flag then don't do it. That's different than acknowledging God because the government wants you to pledge and do so. To use government force or coercion to recite a pledge including God seems a violation of the first on religious grounds.
Force doesn't matter. The Court has consistently ruled that even "voluntary" prayers in public schools constitute Establishment.
-Eric
108 posted on
03/24/2004 7:27:44 PM PST by
E Rocc
(Ich bein un Clinton Hasser)
To: breakem
To use government force or coercion to recite a pledge including God seems a violation of the first on religious grounds.To use government force or coercion to recite any pledge is clearly a violation of freedom of speech. So the only question is whether force is involved. If it is, then the entire pledge has to go.
114 posted on
03/24/2004 7:51:59 PM PST by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson