Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dogbyte12
Yes, if Steffie, as an employee of the White House, gave a background briefing that directly contradicted his later statements, the Clinton White House could ethically release the briefing.

When you work for the White House, you speak with the voice of the White House. And the White House controls all the information eminating from it, both background and public.

This is similar to corporations reminding you that whatever work you do for them is their property. Same principle.

2,358 posted on 03/24/2004 12:44:54 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2300 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
Fox said the reason it was "background" is that the White House asked them to do it that way. So today, they asked if they could release it, and they agreed. So it basically was the White House that decides whether it is on the record or background.
2,579 posted on 03/24/2004 1:16:36 PM PST by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2358 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson