To: BigSkyFreeper
Now he's defending Abu Nidal because he didn't threaten the United States?
I, I, I, I, I
Clarke: I tried to convince the Bush administration we should eliminate Al Qaeda but they didn't take me up on it until after 9/11.
NOW THAT'S A FLAT OUT LIE. FLAT OUT LIE. It's been well established that the president wanted to take out AQ, not just swat flies.
1,678 posted on
03/24/2004 11:40:09 AM PST by
Peach
To: Peach
Thompson hit it out of the park.
Gorelick, et al will now proceed as if the past 10 minutes didn't take place.
Any other Pubs left to question this POS?
To: Peach
Precisely. Rummy said yesterday they initially didn't want to swat flies but to exterminate them. Swatting flies wouldn't have solved the problem. (reaching back to the Clinton misadministration lobbing missiles into factories and tents). It didn't solve one damn thing.
1,703 posted on
03/24/2004 11:42:29 AM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: Peach
Now he's defending Abu Nidal because he didn't threaten the United States?He should talk to Ollie North's family who was in the gunsights of Abu Nidal. Living in complete fear in the 1980's and 1990's. Going so far as to change the locks on their house.
1,762 posted on
03/24/2004 11:51:00 AM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson