Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: twas
Since Roe v. Wade was handed down by the Supreme Court in 1973, more than 44 million babies have been killed. Roughly one-third of those babies were African American.

OK, let's do the math (assuming the facts are accurate here - and I believe the figures are far higher).

About 15 Million African American innocent Babies killed.

About 29 Million Non-African American innocent Babies killed.

What part of, "Thou shalt not Kill", don't we understand?

9 posted on 03/24/2004 6:13:10 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sr4402
"What part of, "Thou shalt not Kill", don't we understand?"

To the Demonrats, it's perfectly okay to kill an innocent baby, but it's somehow wrong to kill a guilty murderer.

You have to be awfully crazy to be a Demonrat.
16 posted on 03/24/2004 7:25:15 AM PST by Steely Glint ("Communists are just Democrats in a big hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402
Back in 1888, Robert Louis Stevenson forecast the agenda of utopians such as these. In "The Four Reformers," he wrote:

"Four reformers met under a bramble bush. They were all agreed the world must be changed. 'We must abolish property,' said one. 'We must abolish marriage,' said the second. 'We must abolish God,' said the third. 'I wish we could abolish work,' said the fourth. 'Do not let us get beyond practical politics,' said the first. 'The first thing is reduce men to a common level.' 'The first thing,' said the second, 'is to give freedom to the sexes.' 'The first thing,' said the third, 'is to find out how to do it.' 'The first step,' said the first, 'is to abolish the Bible.' 'The first thing,' said the second, 'is to abolish the laws,' 'The first thing,' said the third, 'is to abolish mankind'." (1125)

"Abolish mankind" ... a true case of reductio ad absurdum, right? Wrong.

Jacques-Yves Cousteau

Jacques-Yves Cousteau wanted to go part of the way toward abolishing mankind. In a November 1991 interview with The UNESCO Courier, he said:

[In response to an interviewer's question, "Some snakes, mosquitoes, and other animal species pose threats or dangers for humankind. Can they be eliminated like viruses that cause certain diseases?," Cousteau said:] "Getting rid of viruses is an admirable idea, but it raises enormous problems. In the first 1,400 years of the Christian era, population numbers were virtually stationary. Through epidemics, nature compensated for excess births by excess deaths. I talked about this problem with the director of the Egyptian Academy of Sciences. He told me that scientists were appalled to think that by the year 2080 the population of Egypt might reach 250 million. What should we do to eliminate suffering and disease? It's a wonderful idea but perhaps not altogether a beneficial one in the long run. If we try to implement it we may jeopardize the future of our species. It's terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it. But the general situation in which we are involved is lamentable." (1126)

http://fatima.freehosting.net/Articles/Art3.htm
17 posted on 03/24/2004 7:27:03 AM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson