1 posted on
03/23/2004 7:48:10 PM PST by
nwrep
To: nwrep
Is this a parody?
2 posted on
03/23/2004 7:50:39 PM PST by
AM2000
To: nwrep
Looks like somebody's been lurking over at DU again. Now go take a shower and make sure you get plenty of soap in your eyes.
To: nwrep
Hey listen, although communism killed 100,000,000+ people last century, this is a totally new century.
If we could only get the right people running it, communism would like totally work for everybody and stuff.
Besides, if communism ever goes totally out of style, I'll have to throw out three drawers of Che t-shirts.
6 posted on
03/23/2004 7:52:55 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: nwrep
Go Hugo, you got it right. Mr. Bush is the correct choice for America. You environmentalists wackos please vote for Mr. Nader, I support you,
9 posted on
03/23/2004 7:55:38 PM PST by
Ethyl
To: nwrep
This does not surprise me. Its because liberals hate America. That is not hyperbole. Its the damn truth.
10 posted on
03/23/2004 7:58:30 PM PST by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: nwrep
I don't think I can support a guy like Kerry who makes statements like this. I think Greens are the answer.
THAT is the message that needs to be spammed over the Rat airwaves! Go, Ralph, Go! Siphon them thar Kerry votes!
12 posted on
03/23/2004 8:01:02 PM PST by
ErnBatavia
(Gay marriage is for suckers...)
To: nwrep
Can anyone say Sister Souljah?
13 posted on
03/23/2004 8:03:06 PM PST by
Bob J
(www.freerepublic.net www.radiofreerepublic.com...check them out!)
To: nwrep
I think the disgruntled commie is being too hasty. The evidence of past behavior suggests that when Kerry says he opposes something or someone, it actually means he supports it, and vice versa. Specifically, with regard to another Latin American dictator, he showed his strong support for the anti-Castro Helms-Burton law by voting against it in '96, not withstanding that he touted his vote for it to Cuban expatriates in Florida just this year.
The commie supporter should be more worried if Kerry spoke favorably of Chavez, which would presumably mean that he would oppose him when it came to actual votes and actions. But, admittedly, even this is not certain, because sometimes Kerry either opposes or supports a measure by supporting and opposing it.
It gets kinda confusing.
17 posted on
03/23/2004 8:32:59 PM PST by
Stultis
To: nwrep
Maybe Kerry's finally figured out that some of these foreign tinhorn endorsements aren't all they were cracked up to be a couple weeks ago.
To: nwrep
I think we should all go on DU and SUPPORT NADER! Raise a ruckus about every difference Kerry and Nader have. And push the "he doesnt have a view on anything" line about Kerry... that can work on leftists as well as conservatives. In fact it's probably even more frustrating for them.
19 posted on
03/23/2004 9:38:19 PM PST by
Betaille
("Show them no mercy, for none shall be shown to you")
To: nwrep; Cincinatus' Wife; Tailgunner Joe; tallhappy
All Kerry can dither is: Chavez is a
"dubious democrat".
If a Castro-style dictator looks anything like a democrat at all, we have more to worry about Kerry than most even at the center would like to admit.
We knew that anyway.
21 posted on
03/23/2004 10:15:43 PM PST by
risk
To: nwrep
Trying to portray himself as another Clintoon Centrists no doubt to sway centrists voters. We ain't bitin this time!!!! kerry(not capitolised on purpose) = LOSER!!!!
22 posted on
03/23/2004 10:17:53 PM PST by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: nwrep
I guess Kerry's just another wholly-owned subsidiary of BushCo.
;^)
27 posted on
03/24/2004 10:15:49 AM PST by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: nwrep
Lemme guess, Democrat Underground?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson