[Sabertooth]

Is Eric a quick study, or what?

Eric addressed a single point I made, and didn't study it well. He misunderstood the purpose of linking the 1994 Proposition #187 results and the 2003 poll results. In every other instance, he begged the question, preferring to answer quickly rather than thoughtfully.

I won't, however, assume he did so by studying your style, BC.

On the other hand, I addressed every one of his to me, catching numerous errors and internal contradicitions, couched in the guise of "strategy."

The other thing is that Sabertooth will always respond, and never (that I've seen) to admit his error.

To admit error, one first to be shown it.

To be shown error, one would first have to see one's points addressed.

Mr. Hogue neglected to address my points.

You, by the way, neglected to address your post about me, to me.

So, at some point, you just have to start throwing your seed onto more fertile soil

Yes, and the fertility of your posts is routinely pungent. Have a seed.

[BibChr]

Q.E.D. So predictable.

[BibChr]

Me: The other thing is that Sabertooth will always respond, and never (that I've seen) to admit his error. So, at some point, you just have to start throwing your seed onto more fertile soil

Sabertooth: [see above]

Me: taking my own advice. Putting Mr. Look-at-me-Look-at-me back on "Ignore."

Dan