Replies

Back when you were a prime mover and leader of the recall the afternoon and evening hosts on that "other" station ridiculed the idea of a recall -- though the evening guy claimed his show started the whole thing! Go figure.

I wrote a scathing email to the evening guy while he was on the air. I pointed out that I have been a fan of radio talk since the 1950s -- 1940s if you count Baby Snooks, Fibber McGee, et al.

I told him he was insulting the hundreds of citizens out gathering signatures. That was before Issa. IMO I told him that his comments were the most disgusting things I have ever heard on radio besides the worst of leftist babble. Was it his employer's wishes that he and the other guy trash a local competitor, I asked. I swear I heard his demeanor change. I am sure he read it.

I have heard some of your show. I can darn near say the same things about you. Rail all you want but we will still oppose drivers' licenses for ILLEGALS and any Republican who disagrees. We are citizens not Party hacks. We will not vote for dem Rats but we will not kowtow to the Party.

Yes, I heard you say you oppose DLs for ILLEGALS too.

The son of Prop 187 would be a good way to stop all this crap. But, 187 is the other guy's game, huh?

Yes, I read your reasoning for opposing 187, I had the courtesy to read them. I wish someone cuold explain how 187 "unpopularity" can be anything other than leftist spin. In an earlier post I provided figures from the 1994 election and asked the same question. 187 caused Republican defeats? How? Why did mainstream Republican candidates avoid conservative talk radio prior to 2000? (At least in N. California) Avoiding conservatives hurt them, not 187. IMO.

Some say that most Legislature Republicans have pledged "no" votes. No super majority is possible in that case. That's critical because I believe that a super majority would make the bill "referendum proof." In other words citizens could not overturn it. A bill could still pass with a simple majority, however.

The new Prop 187 is all the more important. Thanks to the mainstream Republicans' hysterical reaction to Americans expressing their conserns about DLs and the governor's own statements we just might get enough signatures but it's going to be close.

I am hearing from Americans who hold the right to express their opinions dear that the governor is likely to state unequivocally that he does not share Cedillo's optimism. For anyone who's been following this rationally that is not surprising.

The governor and California legislature Republicans have been swamped by public reaction. It's called citizens' right to demand our elected representatives' position on critical matters be stated clearly.

I'm not in opposition to 187...nor am I in opposition to SB1160...my point IS strategy!

Why are we allowing Gil Cedillo and the Left to establish the debate, the negotiation issues and the propaganda.

I'm NOT anti-187, nor anti-SB1160...I'm anti-bash Arnold before we have reason to do so!

That other talker is still mad at Arnold and the recall so he is trying to get ratings while carrying water for the Dems!

Read closer and stay focused! Thanks!