Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ProudGOP
I hope I'm wrong but it seems to me that this letter can be easily explained away by saying he was being polite, professional, and trying not to burn any bridges.

Except in his letter Clarke praises the President's "determined, calm leadership" on 9/11. In his book Clarke accuses the President of "intimidation" on 9/11---ordering Clarke to find a link between the attacks and Iraq.

Clarke's lying in one of them.

Besides, if you're concerned about not burning bridges, would you write this book?

Something's rotten in Denmark. And it's spelled "Clarke".

113 posted on 03/23/2004 4:24:50 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Right_in_Virginia
Besides, if you're concerned about not burning bridges, would you write this book?

Something's rotten in Denmark. And it's spelled "Clarke".

I don't for a moment believe Clarke's assertions in his book. I just think the media is going to explain this letter away and continue to attack.

The media doesn't care if it is true, they only care if it will hurt Bush.

117 posted on 03/23/2004 4:28:37 PM PST by ProudGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson