Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California: Insurance repeal OK'd for ballot [mandatory business-furnished health insurance]
Sacramento Bee ^ | March 23, 2004 | Lisa Rapaport

Posted on 03/23/2004 9:24:15 AM PST by John Jorsett

Edited on 04/12/2004 6:07:27 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The secretary of state has certified a referendum for the November ballot that will ask voters to repeal California's controversial new law requiring companies to buy health insurance for workers, backers of the referendum effort announced Monday.

Official certification of the more than 624,000 petition signatures submitted will allow opponents of the new law, a coalition of business groups called Californians Against Government Run Healthcare, to put their referendum on the ballot.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; healthcare; sb2; socializedmedicine

1 posted on 03/23/2004 9:24:16 AM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
The citizens of California are taking the state back from the Sacramento Socialists.

The State may end up being a Direct Democracy before long.
2 posted on 03/23/2004 9:30:31 AM PST by So Cal Rocket (If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
The State may end up being a Direct Democracy before long.

Kali has been so mismanaged this might be a good idea.

3 posted on 03/23/2004 10:02:49 AM PST by upchuck (I am upchuck and I approved this message because... well, just because.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"...California's controversial new law requiring companies to buy health insurance for workers,"

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

SEC. 19. Private property may be taken or damaged for public use only when just compensation, ascertained by a jury unless waived, has first been paid to, or into court for, the owner.

U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights

Amendment V: ...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

"Companies" are owned by private property owners, whether as sole proprietors or stock holders.

The law, as currently enacted without a compensation mechanism, is obviously unconstitutional.

4 posted on 03/23/2004 10:23:00 AM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
The law, as currently enacted without a compensation mechanism, is obviously unconstitutional.

So are Minimum Wage Laws, the California Coastal Commission, and the Air Quality Management District.

5 posted on 03/23/2004 10:37:20 AM PST by So Cal Rocket (If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Does the current law require providing health insurance for illegal aliens?

Kalifornians are still going to be picking up the medical tabs there, no matter how this vote comes out.

6 posted on 03/23/2004 10:46:42 AM PST by Gritty ("welfare's greatest crime isn't it's a waste of money, but that it's a waste of people-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson