If I'm distorting facts, it is unintentional. After just looking at them, you are correct, the court documents do claim a male hitting a female. The male and female in the case claim otherwise.
I also just looked at the large version of the tape. The court documents also state that the female was a passenger (again, contradicted by Hiibel and his daughter.) In the tape Hiible says "You've got a driver" (or something to that effect) and gestures towards the truck. From the very beginning of the tape (when the officer first pulls up) it appears his daughter is in the driver's seat.
I don't have an agenda beyond hoping for a reversal of the continuing erosion of our rights. I'm not sure what your agenda is, but you seem very hostile towards this case.