Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sweet Land
re: "Not everything people have to hide is criminal."

Hey! The ONLY thing being discussed in this case is whether, when upon PUBLIC property, whether or not you should be required to give an officer your NAME, upon request!

Or did you miss that point?
335 posted on 03/23/2004 2:40:29 PM PST by RonHolzwarth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]


To: RonHolzwarth
Hey! The ONLY thing being discussed in this case is whether, when upon PUBLIC property, whether or not you should be required to give an officer your NAME, upon request! Or did you miss that point?

I think you should go back and read the writs.

337 posted on 03/23/2004 2:44:51 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

To: RonHolzwarth
Not everything people have to hide is criminal.

Hey! The ONLY thing being discussed in this case is whether, when upon PUBLIC property, whether or not you should be required to give an officer your NAME, upon request!

Revealing your name may render less secure a noncriminal secret. And what if I as a law-abiding citizen simply think it's none of his business what my name is?

486 posted on 03/24/2004 11:40:31 AM PST by Sweet Land
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson