To: Sweet Land
re: "Not everything people have to hide is criminal."
Hey! The ONLY thing being discussed in this case is whether, when upon PUBLIC property, whether or not you should be required to give an officer your NAME, upon request!
Or did you miss that point?
To: RonHolzwarth
Hey! The ONLY thing being discussed in this case is whether, when upon PUBLIC property, whether or not you should be required to give an officer your NAME, upon request! Or did you miss that point? I think you should go back and read the writs.
337 posted on
03/23/2004 2:44:51 PM PST by
cinFLA
To: RonHolzwarth
Not everything people have to hide is criminal.Hey! The ONLY thing being discussed in this case is whether, when upon PUBLIC property, whether or not you should be required to give an officer your NAME, upon request!
Revealing your name may render less secure a noncriminal secret. And what if I as a law-abiding citizen simply think it's none of his business what my name is?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson