To: wallcrawlr
At the heart of the case is an intersection of the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from unreasonable searches, and the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent.The courts are too busy inventing new "rights" (e.g., abortion and gay sex) to protect the ones we already have.
To: Sweet Land
It's important to distinguish between 'constitutional' and 'civil rights'....and I sincerely doubt most gov't. bueaucrats know the difference between the two.
To: Sweet Land
"At the heart of the case is an intersection of the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from unreasonable searches, and the Fifth Amendment right to remain silent." How about the First? Shouldn't freedom of speech include the right to keep one's mouth closed?
137 posted on
03/23/2004 8:22:21 AM PST by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: Sweet Land
The courts are too busy inventing new "rights" (e.g., abortion and gay sex) to protect the ones we already have. You have nailed the Ninth CCofA right on the head!
252 posted on
03/23/2004 11:30:06 AM PST by
cinFLA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson