Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cinFLA
There is a more informative thread running that stresses the elements; the question I posed was simply a means to declare that the issue has not been settled.

We can all speculate and take sides, but the SCOTUS is charged with clarifying the conditions for upholding or striking the decisions of the lower courts and hence, the law.

Your opinion is not likely to sway their decision.

175 posted on 03/23/2004 9:47:54 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Old Professer
We can all speculate and take sides, but the SCOTUS is charged with clarifying the conditions for upholding or striking the decisions of the lower courts and hence, the law.

And we all know that the liberal 9th is the most overturned court in the land.

176 posted on 03/23/2004 9:51:00 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: Old Professer
There is a more informative thread running that stresses the elements; the question I posed was simply a means to declare that the issue has not been settled.

It would have been settled if the 9th had not ruled that a driver was not required to show his DL during a traffic stop.

178 posted on 03/23/2004 9:53:27 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson