To: wallcrawlr
I think the cop was sent there for a legitimate call. I would have locked the guy up too.
To: Cap'n Crunch
I think the cop was sent there for a legitimate call.That's irrelevant to whether he was obligated to identify himself.
I would have locked the guy up too.
On what charge?
To: Cap'n Crunch
Yeah, and the investigation was initiated by a citizen's call to boot.
I don't see anything on this guy's side.
If a cop has a good reason to ID a guy then he has a duty to.
I don't see why the court thinks this is a good case for defining what is a "good reason" though.
89 posted on
03/23/2004 7:37:21 AM PST by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: Cap'n Crunch
"I think the cop was sent there for a legitimate call. I would have locked the guy up too." Was the call? on what charge would you lock him up? For being arrogant enough to challenge your self importance as an officer of the law?
Get a life, and remember who you serve.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson