Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wallcrawlr
I think the cop was sent there for a legitimate call. I would have locked the guy up too.
17 posted on 03/23/2004 6:40:12 AM PST by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cap'n Crunch
I think the cop was sent there for a legitimate call.

That's irrelevant to whether he was obligated to identify himself.

I would have locked the guy up too.

On what charge?

19 posted on 03/23/2004 6:43:22 AM PST by Sweet Land
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Cap'n Crunch
Yeah, and the investigation was initiated by a citizen's call to boot.
I don't see anything on this guy's side.

If a cop has a good reason to ID a guy then he has a duty to.
I don't see why the court thinks this is a good case for defining what is a "good reason" though.

89 posted on 03/23/2004 7:37:21 AM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Cap'n Crunch
"I think the cop was sent there for a legitimate call. I would have locked the guy up too."

Was the call? on what charge would you lock him up? For being arrogant enough to challenge your self importance as an officer of the law?

Get a life, and remember who you serve.

172 posted on 03/23/2004 9:31:35 AM PST by Lloyd227
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson