Replies

The prosection is itself the source:

1. They claimed someone witnessed the event

2. In the most publicized case they ever tried, they could not find the witness.

It isn't credible the witness disappeared.

As I pointed out:

Calls to PDs are always logged, and usually recorded.

It would be unusual if the call was not to 911.

Even if it wasn't, the telco would have a record of the call including the number it originated from.

The PD's dispatcher should also have taken name number and address information.

So: No name. No number. No address. No call detail record at the telco. No 911 log. No 911 recording. No recording of any type. No return call from the dispatcher to verify.

Just the assertion there was a report. Not a shred of evidence that the report was made and that the witness exists.

In how many other instances when someone calls the PD is there such a lack of information and untraceability of the caller? This situation is either the height of misfortune, or the cop that claimed there was such a report is lying.