1 posted on
03/23/2004 12:01:00 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Well,Mr Gaffney,your friend may have performed honorable service for years,but the look on his face and the venom in his voice as he described the President's request right after 911 to look into a possible Iraq connection shows a bitter man out to justify himself.
He said the President did not imply he should make up such a connection but he felt undue pressure to find one.He "felt" ...
2 posted on
03/23/2004 12:49:13 AM PST by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: kattracks
A debate on the issues would be exceedingly unusual in the election. One thing that guarantees that there will be no debate, is that neither candidate has a lock on any original issue of substance. The debate has to be engaged in personalities and degree of stupidity of the other. Both are liberals, interventionists, big spenders, with varying views of how rapidly the nation should advance toward complete socialism. Neither has had the capacity to see the results that have made most socialist nations fall by the wayside. The candidates are a reflection of the pool of voters that support them. I am not encouraged by this fact alone.
3 posted on
03/23/2004 12:51:44 AM PST by
meenie
To: kattracks
Typical inside Washington BS. These insiders just can't stand anyone being shown as the opportunists and self-centered jerks most of them are.
They go to cocktail parties and dinner together and they just can't stand calling a spade a spade lest it gets them off the A-list of invitations to trumped up affairs where they sit around and pat themselves on the back for being so clever and in power.
Face it Frank, he's a pinhead and a total suck up and self-centered moron that cares only about his legacy in DC amongst you phonies.
There has to be a special place in Hell for these pretend adversaries, commentators and so-called journalists.
4 posted on
03/23/2004 12:56:19 AM PST by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "John Kerry is an admitted War Criminal and should thus be in jail"!)
To: kattracks
So, too, is his ill-concealed contempt for those who were concerned before and after September 11 about links between Osama bin Laden's terrorist network and a weapon of mass destruction-equipped state-sponsor of terror like Saddam
Those who were concerned before September 11 about links between bin Laden and WMD state sponsors.
Those like Clarke.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson