Rich on Bush, "The Divider"
In an unusual video commentary posted on the Times website, Frank Rich answers reader mail. By what surely is sheer coincidence, every single reader agrees with Rich's take on whatever issue is in question, praising Rich's support for gay marriage and his foaming dislike of Mel Gibson and "The Passion."
Near the end of segment six, he sniffs: "One of the sad things about the Bush administration is, the president did talk about wanting to set a new tone when he came in and indeed he was in a good position to do so, because he not been caught up in the Clinton wars, he had been away from Washington, he had been a governor in Texas, and had not been an antagonist in all that really, and there was an opportunity there that I think he lost, because he's turned out to be as much a divider as a uniter, if not more so."
Apparently, it's not "divisive" to talk of "right-wing bloviators" and comparing supporters of traditional marriage to George Wallace.
http://www.timeswatch.org/topicindex/R/rich_frank/welcome.asp[ Rich's take on whatever issue is in question, praising Rich's support for gay marriage and his foaming dislike of Mel Gibson and "The Passion." ]
Obviously Rich GOT the film as did his "demons" and they are hopping mad. A good story rightly told is in direct opposition to the "Father of Lies".. as shown by Rich and his employers.. It must be a miserable living in such a world as Rich does..
i.e. so much truth to obfuscate, and so little time to morph it..
The only response is, "TO HELL WITH HIM"..