[Your Nightmare]

You're going to have to point out where I endorsed the Dems "wingeing" Bush by one standard and absolving themselves by another.

And you didn't address my point. Am I to assume you can't?

You have an appropriate nickname.

[dodger]

DO TELL WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN YOUR INCHOATE POINT IN THAT (& WE LIKE YOUR NAME TOO, 'YOUR NIGHTMARE') ...

YOU SAY: And you didn't address my point. Am I to assume you can't? You have an appropriate nickname.

I SAID: ... However, you would do well to lecture the DemoKerrys as to their fetish for claiming 'record job losses under Bush' in that they refer to absolute numbers rather than rates. Yet you seem to endorse their wingeing him by one standard and absolving themselves by another -- more liberal, of course -- standard.

You do understand about comparing 'apples to apples', right?

YOU SAID: ... That's why we use the unemployment rate to gage what the employment situation is in the country.

I SAID: Now, do tell why you would yelp as if MORE JOBS and the SAME UNEMPLOYMENT RATE with W & Beelzebubba is a bad thing. Do you wish to cover for the DemoKerrys whilst they screech about 'record job losses'?

What's Your NIGHTMARISH angle??

[dodger]

PS: I have not said that you 'endorsed the Dems wingeing about Bush', but merely raise the question. Indeed, your 'point' -- such as it barely is discernable as a point -- has been previously flushed by yours truly down the porcelain stool as dispensable donkey-wipery ....

Moreover if you must at all, please do respond with a relevant comment lest you be confirmed an apologist for the Botox Queen hisself and, further thereby, do yourself tell why you would yelp as if MORE JOBS and the SAME UNEMPLOYMENT RATE with W & Beelzebubba is a bad thing.

Assuming both the insincereity and inconsequence of your further hypnopompic replies,

TTFN ...

[dodger]

& FINALLY, MY DEAR PHANTASM de NOCTUS, IT IS -- REALLY -- YOU WHO HAS THE MORE APT NICKNAME (NOT THAT I WOULD 'GAGE' [sic] SUCH ...).

TTFFN,