To: Your Nightmare
I guess 5.6% seems a lot better if you start with 7.3% than if you start with 4.2%. But what is the theoritical (natural) minimum? Isn't it around 3.5%? Wouldn't that then make 4.2% extremely low and hard to sustain?
-PJ
To: Political Junkie Too
5 to 6% was always the "structural" employment figures I have seen cited. 4% is and was used as a sign of "overheating" and generally resulted in higher interest rates because of inflationary pressure.
23 posted on
03/23/2004 8:11:31 PM PST by
Texasforever
(I am all flamed out.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson