To: Momaw Nadon
I would have to agree with the others here,
Pennsylvania (and not just cuz Im from there) and West Virginia are a statistical dead heat.
I think the only reason that they are giving these states to Kerry is to keep betting interest up.
29 posted on
03/22/2004 1:02:25 PM PST by
cuz_it_aint_their_money
(The only way liberals win national elections is by pretending they're not liberals. - Rush Limbaugh)
To: cuz_it_aint_their_money
Actually Bush could lose 2 of those states and still win. Given the same results as last time, he would win 278-260 (interestingly enough, this agrees with what is shown above, except WV and NM are flip-flopped). NV, NH and WV have 4 or 5 EV's. Losing 2 of them could make it a tie, in which case Bush would most likely win. Plus there's a chance one of the Maine EV's could go to Bush. (Maine is an odd state that doesn't necessarily give all the delegates to one guy).
I agree with you regarding Ohio. Of the 3 states, OH, PA and FL, I think Ohio is the least likely to go to Kerry. It's really hard to see Bush winning the election if he loses Ohio.
A recent poll shows Bush slightly ahead in Michigan. Given that, it's hard to see how he could be behind in Ohio. I think the people betting the money have it right, and Ohio is a likely Bush state at this point.
34 posted on
03/22/2004 2:05:02 PM PST by
TomEwall
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson