[XHogPilot]

There is so much obfuscation on "the Kansas City meeting". For me it comes down to this: If Kerry was there, he participated in a conspiracy to murder and conspiracy to treason.
Granted, a meeting where a lone individual raises the prospect of an illegal act might be dismissed. But the KC meeting was intentionally set up to provide full consideration of heinous criminal acts. That the murders never took place because of a "democratic vote" is meaningless. A "democratic vote" in that respect is simply the rule of a treasonous mob. If John Kerry attended such a meeting, he has far more to answer than how he voted. < /rant>

(Any district attorneys out there, I'd appreciate clarification on conspiracy.)

[onedoug]

By this time Kerry had admittedly committed war crimes and likely murder. Here, he was extending that expertise to the other side.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

I'd appreciate clarification on conspiracy

If he took part in a meeting where a plan to murder Senators was discussed...he is guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. Period.

[Agnes Heep]

If memory serves, at least three of the individuals hanged for the Lincoln assassination conspiracy took no "active" part in the assassination attempts on Lincoln and Seward.

[antiRepublicrat]

If John Kerry attended such a meeting, he has far more to answer than how he voted. </rant>

It's no rant -- he was involved with a group that seriously considered committing major felonies, and was present at the meeting in which one was considered. But I'd bet the statute of limitations has run out for any conspiracy charge.