[fuzzthatwuz]

"A spokesman for Mr. Kerry’s presidential campaign, David Wade, last week issued a statement to the Sun, following a week of denials, that said “we accept” Mr. Kerry’s presence in Kansas City as a “historical footnote.”

The only historical footnote that I observe is the admission to the lie after repeated denial. For Kerry and his crew that IS historical. Yet is Wade's statement, "we accept Mr. Kerry's presense in Kansas City" a clear admission? No, just continued deniability from the Dems. This story has a good chance to get legs.

[OldFriend]

Discussing the murder of senators is a mere historical footnote?