Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
That makes your post nothing more than histrionics.

And that makes your post a giant suck up. There are people who don't want the truth about what is happening to this country to be discussed. In order to shut up the people like me, the word has gone out that my arguments mustn't be discussed, but that I must be insulted. If you think this is going to stop me, you are wrong.

There was proof that Clinton gave the guidance system to China for campaign cash. Yeah, try Clinton for treason? The Senate Republicans would laugh at that, seeing as how they acted when the House sent over boxes of proof that he was a liar, among other things. Have we sunk so low that we'd try to cover this over just to get back at me?

26 posted on 03/22/2004 7:53:45 AM PST by swampfox98 (Beyond 2004 - Chaos! 200 million illegals waiting in the wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: swampfox98
"There was proof that Clinton gave the guidance system to China for campaign cash."

Much as I would have liked to actually have that be true, it isn't.

To qualify as treason under the Constitution, you would need two people testifying that they saw Bill Clinton either give the guidance system to a ChiCom agent in return for cash, or gaving those specific orders for that express purpose.

That's not a "suck up", that's the Constitution.

Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

33 posted on 03/22/2004 8:05:14 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: swampfox98
Or you could get Bill to confess in open Court.
35 posted on 03/22/2004 8:06:38 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: swampfox98
You would also be hard put defining China as an enemy...most favored trading partner status and all that.
36 posted on 03/22/2004 8:10:39 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson