[BibChr]

Change what subject? Have you lost the thread of the dialogue you started?

Rice for President 2008, said one poster.

What's her position on killing children for being inconvenient or imperfect?, I asked. (Nobody's answered yet, btw; just a lot of gassing about this and that irrelevancy.)

Then you came in on the attack, and I've responded.

Who changed the subject? Is her candidacy for President not the subject?

Then you're complaining to the wrong poster.

But I already pointed that out, didn't I? Have you gotten back to the person who brought up the topic, yet?

Dan

[justshutupandtakeit]

Your attack on Rice was a change of subject from the foreign policy content of this thread. There is no other way to view it. I respond to whom I wish not to whom YOU think I should.

[section9]

Please stop.

This is a thread about Richard Clarke's charges agianst Condi Rice and the Bush Administration concerning the buildup to 9-11. You want to talk about abortion. This isn't the thread for that.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

[Gracey]

Since I made the comment, and as the thread poster pointed out, my comment had to do with the continuation of our country under someone who will be HARD AS NAILS against the Islamofacists, against the Leftists in OUR country, against the Clintonistas. I can't think of anyone tougher than Condi. The last thought on my mind is your perpetual subject.

I care about the viability of this country, this country that will be a WAR with Islamofacists for many years to come. Our choice is Hitlary or someone tough TOUGH defender of our country, a TOUGH woman who has no qualms about going to war against our enemies. That's my focal point. That's the subject of this thread and nothing more. Geez. You're really a very decent guy... one of my favorites but let's put issues in their proper perspective.

Adopt a child if that's your preference. I have