To: Fledermaus; ALOHA RONNIE; Travis McGee; Grampa Dave; Squantos; blackie; archy; MEG33; backhoe; ...
It's past time for all of our decent and upright leaders to admit that the USA has been appeasing its domestic enemies for 55 years. When Truman undercut McArthur in Korea, that was the moment we started seeing the division occur. Why? Was it a conspiracy? I think it was fear. We were tired of fighting. And our enemies knew it. The effectiveness of other conspiracies increased after that Faustian moment.
29 posted on
03/22/2004 1:58:37 AM PST by
risk
To: risk
...fear... *external* enemies knew it...
30 posted on
03/22/2004 2:03:35 AM PST by
risk
To: risk
Truman did not want to go to war with Mao or Uncle Joe...and I do think we were tired.
32 posted on
03/22/2004 2:08:29 AM PST by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: risk
We should have helped the warlord Chiang Kai Shek more at the proper time to keep Mao out of power at the end of WW2
There were many communists and fellow travelers in and around our State Dept during and after WW2(Yes McCarthy was right.)It was terribly fashionable.
34 posted on
03/22/2004 2:22:24 AM PST by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: risk
It's past time for all of our decent and upright leaders to admit that the USA has been appeasing its domestic enemies for 55 years. When Truman undercut McArthur in Korea, that was the moment we started seeing the division occur. Why? Was it a conspiracy? I think it was fear. We were tired of fighting. And our enemies knew it. The effectiveness of other conspiracies increased after that Faustian moment. That and distraction. Truman did very well with containing Soviet expansionism in Berlin and Greece, and a juggling act can only be carried on for so long before the inevitable comes to pass.
But even given Truman's personality and personal shortcomings, I thing he was horrified at the possibility the public would learn just how much his predecessor had bargained away. He kept the lid on as well as he could, but our adversaries were not playing by his rules.
The funny thing is, the American public probably would have supported him had he taken the steps then that were really necessary. And he might be remembered as the American president who accomplished what had to wait for Reagan to come along to get done. -archy-/-
38 posted on
03/22/2004 2:41:01 AM PST by
archy
(Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
To: risk
.
NEVER FORGET
...Why did the CLINTONS refuse 3 Offers from the Sudan during the 1990's to give our No. 1 Terrorist Enemy OSAMA bin LADEN on a Silver Platter that would have prevented the Attacks on US on September 11, 2001..?
'Remember the Lost and Suffering on September 11, 2001'
http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=33 (Photos & Thead)
NEVER FORGET
50 posted on
03/22/2004 5:07:52 AM PST by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
To: risk
Condoleezza Rice ~ Bump!
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ trolls, terrorists, democrats and the mainstream media are sad ~ very sad!
~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~
59 posted on
03/22/2004 7:23:07 AM PST by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: risk
Go back farther...FDR should have let Patton cross the Rhine and take out Stalin.
64 posted on
03/22/2004 6:37:31 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "Tick off France, Germany, Spain and Al Qaeda - VOTE BUSH!")
To: risk
Go back farther...FDR should have let Patton cross the Rhine and take out Stalin.
65 posted on
03/22/2004 6:37:37 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "Tick off France, Germany, Spain and Al Qaeda - VOTE BUSH!")
To: risk
Go back farther...FDR should have let Patton cross the Rhine and take out Stalin.
66 posted on
03/22/2004 6:37:57 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Ðíé F£éðérmáú§ ^;;^ says, "Tick off France, Germany, Spain and Al Qaeda - VOTE BUSH!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson