Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nick Danger
The rise in real wages, as adjusted by the CPI, started in 1996. But no changes were made to the CPI until 1999.

Wouldn't it also exaggerate any current increase in real wages? Would there be any increase in real wages in the past year if the CPI was computed under the old system?

239 posted on 03/21/2004 3:55:32 PM PST by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: sarcasm
Would there be any increase in real wages in the past year if the CPI was computed under the old system?

Probably "yes." Here's why:

If you used "old" CPI methodology, you would get a 0.5% reduction in estimated real wages. But a 1% tax cut swamps that.

I don't think this is worth arguing about. Whether it's up or down a half a point may make it possible for one set of protagonists or the other to beat their chests and crow "It's up!" or "It's down," but what the Hell really is the difference between minus half a percent or plus half a percent? We're talking 130 bucks a year or something like that. BFD.

The real issue is that during the 1970's, when average wages were supposedlly so "high," most of the increase was being eaten up by taxes. The actual wage earner barely saw half of it.

243 posted on 03/21/2004 5:01:45 PM PST by Nick Danger (Give me immortality... or give me death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson