Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Richard Clarke's Legacy of Miscalculation (Richard Clarke, Geek)
Security Focus ^ | Feb 17 2003 | George Smith

Posted on 03/20/2004 12:01:39 PM PST by Thebaddog

The retirement of Richard Clarke is appropriate to the reality of the war on terror. Years ago, Clarke bet his national security career on the idea that electronic war was going to be real war. He lost, because as al Qaeda and Iraq have shown, real action is still of the blood and guts kind.

In happier times prior to 9/11, Clarke -- as Bill Clinton's counter-terror point man in the National Security Council -- devoted great effort to convincing national movers and shakers that cyberattack was the coming thing. While ostensibly involved in preparations for bioterrorism and trying to sound alarms about Osama bin Laden, Clarke was most often seen in the news predicting ways in which electronic attacks were going to change everything and rewrite the calculus of conflict.

September 11 spoiled the fun, though, and electronic attack was shoved onto the back-burner in favor of special operations men calling in B-52 precision air strikes on Taliban losers. One-hundred fifty-thousand U.S. soldiers on station outside Iraq make it perfectly clear that cyberspace is only a trivial distraction.

Saddam will not be brought down by people stealing his e-mail or his generals being spammed with exhortations to surrender.

Clarke's career in subsequent presidential administrations was a barometer of the recession of the belief that cyberspace would be a front effector in national security affairs. After being part of the NSC, Clarke was dismissed to Special Advisor for Cyberspace Security on October 9th in a ceremony led by National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice and new homeland security guru Tom Ridge. If it was an advance, it was one to the rear -- a pure demotion.

Instead of combating terrorists, Clarke would be left to wrestle with corporate America over computer security, a match he would lose by pinfall. Ridding the world of bad guys and ensuring homeland safety was a job for CIA wet affairsmen, the FBI, the heavy bomb wing out of Whiteman Air Force Base -- anyone but marshals in cyberspace.

Information "Sharing" and Cruise Missiles The Slammer virus gave Clarke one last mild hurrah with the media. But nationally, Slammer was a minor inconvenience compared to relentless cold weather in the east and the call up of the reserves.

But with his retirement, Clarke's career accomplishments should be noted.

In 1986, as a State Department bureaucrat with pull, he came up with a plan to battle terrorism and subvert Muammar Qaddafi by having SR-71s produce sonic booms over Libya. This was to be accompanied by rafts washing onto the sands of Tripoli, the aim of which was to create the illusion of a coming attack. When this nonsense was revealed, it created embarrassment for the Reagan administration and was buried.

In 1998, according to the New Republic, Clarke "played a key role in the Clinton administration's misguided retaliation for the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, which targeted bin Laden's terrorist camps in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan." The pharmaceutical factory was, apparently, just a pharmaceutical factory, and we now know how impressed bin Laden was by cruise missiles that miss.

Trying his hand in cyberspace, Clarke's most lasting contribution is probably the new corporate exemption in the Freedom of Information Act. Originally designed to immunize companies against the theoretical malicious use of FOIA by competitors, journalists and other so-called miscreants interested in ferreting out cyber-vulnerabilities, it was suggested well before the war on terror as a measure that would increase corporate cooperation with Uncle Sam. Clarke labored and lobbied diligently from the NSC for this amendment to existing law, law which he frequently referred to as an "impediment" to information sharing.

(Excerpt) Read more at securityfocus.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clintonholdover; clintonholdovers; cybercrime; richardclarke
This is a pretty interesting old column about the guy that the dims are using to beat up on bush. The guy sounds like a total Clinton mole. If it all didn't come in, be sure to read the whole column.
1 posted on 03/20/2004 12:01:40 PM PST by Thebaddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
"But with his retirement, Clarke's career accomplishments should be noted."

I'm not here as an apologist for Clarke. But it's too bad there's no mention of how
Clarke was apparently the ONLY guy in Clinton's inner circle that wanted to
aggressively strike back against bin Laden after the USS Cole bombing (and near-sinking).

Sorry I can't give a text-link, but there is a fairly illuminating passage in the
book cited below about Clarke's shock when the question about "what are we going to do"
about the USS Cole bombing and bin Laden went around the table and Albright,
Tennant, Reno and all the rest, except Clarke found a reason to do basically NOTHING.
(IIRC, the author Miniter interviewed just about every major participant at that
meeting and was suprised at the consistent picture of inertia that emerged...
except for Clarke.)

Losing Bin Laden: How Bill Clinton's Failures Unleashed Global Terror
by Richard Miniter

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895260743/qid=1079813645/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-9714418-1008750?v=glance&s=books
2 posted on 03/20/2004 12:21:48 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
I think Clarke will go the way of Paul O'Neil.
3 posted on 03/22/2004 2:35:16 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Clarke claims that Clinton would have prevented 9/11 but doesn't say how.

It was Clarke's responsibility to advise the President on terrorism. Where is the memo of him telling the President what to do prior to 9/11?

What would he have advised Clinton to do that he didn't advise Bush to do?

The fact that Clarke is the best the Kerry campaign can do is evidence of how shallow their bull pin is.

4 posted on 03/22/2004 2:52:00 AM PST by bayourod (We can depend on Scary Kerry's imaginary foreign leaders to protect us from terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
BTTT
5 posted on 03/22/2004 3:16:17 AM PST by PogySailor (Proud member of the RAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

RICHARD CLARKE, TRAITOR.


6 posted on 03/22/2004 3:36:57 AM PST by Stallone (Guess who Al Qaeda wants to be President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog; dennisw; SJackson; kattracks; dighton; Catspaw; Alouette; quidnunc; JohnHuang2; ...
BTTT...
7 posted on 03/22/2004 9:45:21 AM PST by veronica ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson