Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dubya
Two things I do not like about this plan:

1. When the state reduces its share of spending for various programs, but does not make any cuts to the program itself, it places local governments in a bind to fund the program. This has happened with education. There is a cap on M&O taxes, which many school are approaching, if they have not reached it already, and the state's share of education funding has decreased steadily over the years. Of course, there is also the issue of unfunded mandates, which some counties are trying make unconsitutional. By requiring local governments to perform certain duties and then reducing their ability to perform those duties by limiting their ability to tax, the state government hurts citizens who expected benefits from these programs.

2. It creates a new bureaucracy.

This is the type of thing which has me favoring Dewhurst's state property tax plan.

13 posted on 03/20/2004 12:50:31 PM PST by ThJ1800
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThJ1800
This is the type of thing which has me favoring Dewhurst's state property tax plan

I would favor a State sales tax to fund our schools. That even the Illegals would be paying at least something for their children.

14 posted on 03/20/2004 1:01:06 PM PST by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson