[Qwinn]

"I am suggesting a middle ground actually. Had the original headline read: "Did Kerry advocate 'Domestic terrorism'?" I would have had no problem. But the headline states, as fact that Kerry is a domestic terrorist. I contend that the statement does not square with the facts.

If someone advocates segregation, are they not a segregationist?

If someone advocates conservativism, are they not a conservative?

If someone advocates liberalism, are they not a liberal?

If someone advocates domestic terrorism, are they not a domestic terrorist?

Sometimes you just gotta call a spade a spade, man. Especially when it's something this serious. I'm wondering if we're just not at odds on definitions, here.

Qwinn

[Michael.SF.]

Sometimes you just gotta call a spade a spade, man.

As I understand the situation, Kerry was present at a meeting where the subject of using assassination was brought up. The plan was never implemented and Kerry left the organization a short time after that.

In what context was the plan brought up (i.e., one for serious discussion and consideration, or just a wild idea that was thrown out?). Did Kerry voice an opinion on the subject? Did others?

Just because Kerry was there when someone made the suggestion, does not make Kerry a terrorist.