[Eva]

O'Reilly did a segment on the trend toward placing homosexual books in grade schools. He asked the guest why the left was trying to sexualize young children. I know the answer, they want to influence the children before they are old enough to form a natural aversion to homosexuality. They know that all pre-pubescent children are closer to their own sex than the opposite sex. I don't know what the correct terminology is. Children are not asexual or homosexual, so much as pre-sexual, but this is a very formative time and if the Gay movement can brainwash them during this period, they will have converts for life.

[JesseHousman]

Your answer, Eva, is right on target!

[FourPeas]

if the Gay movement can brainwash them during this period, they will have converts for life.

You are exactly right. I'd only change one thing. There's nothing happy or joyful or gay about being homosexual.

[longtermmemmory]

Which makes these homosexula recruiting books just plain evil.

There is no harmless for these types of books, no inbetween. They need to stay OUT of the schools and away from children. They are no different than any other sexually explicit material.

In fact this book should be available only to the over 18.

[scripter]

Children are not asexual or homosexual, so much as pre-sexual, but this is a very formative time and if the Gay movement can brainwash them during this period, they will have converts for life.

Just wanted to repeat that.

[KC_Conspirator]

Eva you are so right.

[Carton boy]

To Eva, and all. All they went to do is that what they do best,. They just went to jam all this shit down are throat's like they do them selfs.

[Houmatt]

He asked the guest why the left was trying to sexualize young children. I know the answer, they want to influence the children before they are old enough to form a natural aversion to homosexuality.

This is what is commonly known as "recruitment."

[EdReform]

Children are not asexual or homosexual, so much as pre-sexual, but this is a very formative time and if the Gay movement can brainwash them during this period, they will have converts for life.

Targeting Children - Part two: How the homosexual movement uses public schools as instruments of change

"GLSEN activist and New York kindergarten teacher Jaki Williams said starting in kindergarten is a must, since children at that age are still developing their ideas about the world around them. Even at that age, she said, “the saturation process needs to begin.”

Williams, in fact, is a model teacher when it comes to this “saturation” process. She regularly initiates conversations with her children by reading to them such controversial books as Heather Has Two Mommies, Daddy’s Roommate, and One Dad, Two Dads, Browns Dads, Blue Dads. She also hosts a viewing of the video Both of My Moms’ Names Are Judy: Children of Lesbians and Gays Speak Out, produced by a San Francisco pro-homosexual advocacy group.

According to one writer for The Lambda Report, who infiltrated a 1997 GLSEN workshop, one former teacher admitted that changing the mind of a child required more than a one-time effort. She said she had to expose her children to a constant stream of homosexual words and images, because "It’s really a conditioning process."

Education Exchange, November/December 1998

"Often, portions of the video are shown in classrooms with children as young as kindergarten, a practice that Concerned Women for America has labeled "an aggressive new national campaign." A columnist with the New York Post characterized It's Elementary as "78-minutes of relentless propaganda to advance the acceptance of homosexuality, as distinct from tolerance."

Queering Elementary Education

It's Elementary: Gay and Lesbian Issues in the Classroom

Teaching Kindergarten Kids About 'Human Differences' and Homosexuality Isn't 'Easy' in Newton

Also see this excerpt of 'Queering the Schools', and

The World According to PFLAG: Why PFLAG and Children Don't Mix

Recommended Reading for Teenagers? A Closer Look at P-FLAG

Seven Steps to Recruit-proof Your Child

[King Prout]

that was quite a penetrating analysis. thanks for posting it - it adds clarity not found in the rabid invectives issued by either side of this... this mess.