Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Batrachian
Does this mean if Bush wins it is because the Clintons made it happen? I do not buy it. Sometimes I think we give them way too much credit. Bush can beat Kerry without the help of the Clintons. I would hate to see it spun this way the day after the election.
10 posted on 03/20/2004 7:21:55 AM PST by KJacob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: KJacob
Bush can win regardless of whether the Clintonistas deep-six Kerry's campaign, but it's nevertheless interesting to see how truly self-centered Bill & Hillary are, that they would try it.
14 posted on 03/20/2004 7:26:14 AM PST by COBOL2Java (If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading this in English, thank a soldier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KJacob
Bush came within a hair of losing in 2000. He can lose this year. I don't mind Democrats damaging each other and helping to elect Bush. That means that evil has been used to do good. I'll take it. Besides, a lot of more prominent political thinkers that myself have put forward this same theory. It makes a lot of sense.
15 posted on 03/20/2004 7:26:14 AM PST by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson