[Lando Lincoln]

Lando

[CasearianDaoist]

I am unclear as to what he means to say. Is he saying that this is a bait and switch operation, or is he saying that the Rats know they cannot win and are looking to make a scapegoat out of Kerry?

[jocon307]

Wow, from the tone of this piece Kerry will be lucky to get out alive!

I did like this description of him as "educated beyond his intelligence", that is so true of many people, and such a deleterious thing when it happens. It is certainly true of Kerry, and no doubt contributes to his indecisiveness and double-think on almost all issues. For example, he seems to want to be elected our head-of-state in order to turn over control of this country to the leaders of other nations (who probably don't want the task) and the UN (who almost certainly do).

Do you think W could run ads stating: "Unlike myself, Sen. Kerry has been educated beyond his intelligence"?

[Betaille]

"Two plus two no longer equals four, it equals whatever the Democrats tell the media to parrot back to the public."
Perfectly said.

[Cboldt]

Kerry is an arrogant Massachusetts elitist, educated beyond his intelligence, with a more liberal voting record than Ted Kennedy. He is a pathologically indecisive, opportunistic, United Nations bureaucrat-loving, Jane Fonda war veteran surrender monkey who sells his Renoir paintings for campaign cash.

*bump* to that!

[Thom Pain]

"I’m afraid the leading Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. John Kerry, is unknowingly and unwittingly trapped in a classic real-life horror story."

There, that's better.

[Lady Jag]

Kerry is an arrogant Massachusetts elitist, educated beyond his intelligence, with a more liberal voting record than Ted Kennedy. He is a pathologically indecisive, opportunistic, United Nations bureaucrat-loving, Jane Fonda war veteran surrender monkey who sells his Renoir paintings for campaign cash.

Ripping! And it's the truth, too!

[ex-Texan]

BIG *BUMP* !!

[OldFriend]

The anti Kerry factions will NEVER be given time in the media.

If FNC has an anti Kerry spokesman on, they immediately give equal credibility to a Kerry defender.

President Bush will win in spite of the media.

[SkyPilot]

Even with illegal aliens and Democrat felons voting, Milwaukee derelicts bribed with cigarettes by New York limousine liberals, Philadelphia inner city precincts producing an unbelievable 100 percent turnout, a St. Louis Democrat judge keeping inner city districts open and voting until midnight, and the dead voting in almost every Democrat district--they still lost.

That is a classic.

[ontos-on]

That's "fomer" as in "former"

[YaYa123]

And even the party faithful aren't buying Douglas Brinkley's favorable tome about {gag me} hero warrior, John Kerry.

Tour Of Duty is # 930 on Amazon.

Brinkley's book glosses over or omits the negative about Kerry in order to puff him up, isn't selling, and you have to hope the book is a two-fer....destroys the credibility of both Kerry and Brinkley.

[Right_in_Virginia]

"Kerry is an arrogant Massachusetts elitist, educated beyond his intelligence, with a more liberal voting record than Ted Kennedy. He is a pathologically indecisive, opportunistic, United Nations bureaucrat-loving, Jane Fonda war veteran surrender monkey who sells his Renoir paintings for campaign cash. "

Beautiful.

[SunkenCiv]

And once again the good-for-nothing media don't find this strange at all. In fact, they are pumping the hype. Is he the real candidate or is he just another stalking horse until the Democratic convention? Don’t expect the media to shed any light on that subject.

After Kerry's defeat, Noam Chomsky et al will claim it was all part of the evil right wing controlled media to make Kerry look viable when he clearly wasn't. ;') And we'll all go, "awwwww!"

And when the nightly news (Thursday I think; don't remember which big three network) this week ran a story about what the Bush administration did and didn't do to track Osama prior to 9/11, was there any mention of Clinton's very public failure to track him, and very public picking a fight with Osama in order to distract the American public?

The Democrats seem to have found the perfect dupe in Kerry, as they did in Gore and Torricelli. Even when Gen. Wesley Clark slipped and prematurely told the media that "Kerry will implode over an intern issue," who did Kerry blame for spreading lies? Why, President Bush, of course.

That's odd, considering that Kerry was the one who, behind the scenes, spread (mostly) the truth about his same-party opponents during his well-orchestrated come from behind trouncing of every one of his rivals. (':

[Democratshavenobrains]

Actually, early in the primary season, there was some lame Draft Gore movement at DU.

[Cicero]

Excellent article. Whatever this lady does for a living, this is beautifully written and right on the money.

Hillary is, at the very least, keeping her options open. She has until next July to decide whether or not she wants to run for the presidency. If she decides to run, Kerry won't even know what hit him. He will be pulled from the race just like Toricelli, and she will come to the party's rescue by taking his place. By that time there will be no credible alternative to Kerry among the candidates.

All things being equal, Bush should win. But all things are not equal. the 2000 election involved an unprecedented degree of vote corruption, and hillary is capable of doing even worse things than that. They miscalculated how many votes they needed to steal. They won't make that mistake again.

Also, the economy is improving, but it is very precarious. The balance of payments deficits, building for the past 10 or 15 years, are astronomical. Japan could upset the apple cart any time they chose. Maybe China could too, and would be more likely to do so. And let's not forget that Alan Greenspan was one reason why Bush senior lost the 1992 election, because he (perhaps deliberately) reinflated the economy a couple of months too late.

[longtermmemmory]

If Gore and the Democratic machine had succeeded in stealing the election from President Bush, Republican voters would have counted down the dwindling days on the calendar till the next election and marked them with their own blood. They would have walked through brick walls to carry President Bush, and only President George W. Bush, on their shoulders to the next election campaign to rub their honest victory in the face of the lying liars who lied to them.
BR>Well that is a well said reality check.





These G W Bush products anger democrats too.