Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angkor
No, I will not. I expect, on a discussion forum such as this one, that folks back-up their assertions . . . instead of giving me the on-line version of "the dog ate my homework."
19 posted on 03/20/2004 5:26:47 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy
Here you go, for starters:

http://privacy.med.miami.edu/glossary/xd_business_associate.htm

DHHS has taken the position that covered entities are not liable for the privacy violations of business associates. However, if a covered entity becomes aware of a pattern of activity or practice by a business associate that constitutes a material breach, it must:

take reasonable steps to remedy the situation;

if such steps are not successful, terminate the contract or arrangement;

or if termination is not feasible, report the problem to DHHS.

Notwithstanding these provisions, failure to execute a business associate contract with "satisfactory assurances," or to take these corrective actions when the assurances are not met, could result in liability.
23 posted on 03/20/2004 5:42:09 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson