Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
his advocating an alliance between America and Germany

He didn't advocate any such "alliance", stooge.
He advocated neutrality.
But I can understand why the distinction is invisible to your marxist perspective.

157 posted on 03/21/2004 10:31:33 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green
There is no such thing as neutrality Willie.

There most certainly isn't neutrality of moral values, which Lindbergh lacked.

He knew what was going on in Germany, and wanted those who could stop it not only not to, but by their inactions support it.

If you stand by and watch a child being raped and murdered you're not being neutral Willie, you are an accessory to rape and murder.

Lindbergh was an open and vocal advocate of racial purity, and he wanted the US to do nothing while Hitler murdered millions in the name of racial purity.

Lindbergh wanted the US to be an accessory to genocide. That would have made America Hitler's ally.

159 posted on 03/21/2004 10:59:21 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson