[230FMJ]

I assume that's for a civilian. I wonder if the offense is made more serious by the fact that he still held an officers' commission in the US Navy?

[Barnstormer]

You ask an interesting question. If he was still a member of the Fleet Reserve, he would be subject to the UCMJ. If he was subject to the UCMJ, a veritible cornucopia of charges could be applied. (Assuming this could be tied to a treasonous act, which is a capital crime -- and if I remember right, would thereby have no Statute of Limitations?)

If the punative articles of the UCMJ came into play ....

Here's a site that details the punative articles of the UCMJ and has very good, detailed explanation of the various elements of the offense, if you click on the individual UCMJ Articles:

http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/mcm/blmcm.htm